JD Vance Once Said He Hates the Police and That Trump is a 'Morally Reprehensible Human Being,' Emails Show

In a revealing exposé, The New York Times has uncovered a series of emails between Ohio Senator JD Vance and his former Yale classmate, Sofia Nelson, that paint a starkly different picture of the politician from the one currently embraced by the Republican Party. These emails, dating from 2014 to 2017, showcase Vance's earlier ideological stance, which sharply contrasts with his later alignment with Donald Trump.

A Shift in Ideology

Before Vance became a prominent supporter of Trump, he expressed deep discontent with the GOP's acceptance of the former president. In one email, he described Trump as a "morally reprehensible human being," highlighting his disillusionment with the political landscape. This sentiment was particularly poignant in the wake of the 2014 police killing of Michael Brown, a Black teenager, which prompted Vance to voice his frustrations with law enforcement. "I hate the police," he wrote, reflecting on his negative experiences and empathizing with the struggles faced by marginalized communities.

The Fallout with Sofia Nelson

The correspondence between Vance and Nelson, a Detroit-based public defender and transgender activist, reveals a personal rift that developed over political disagreements. Nelson recounted that their friendship deteriorated after Vance expressed support for an Arkansas law banning gender-affirming care for minors, a measure that was later overturned by a federal judge. This divergence in views underscores the broader cultural and political divides that have emerged in recent years.

The Evolution of Vance's Views

As Vance's political career progressed, his views on Trump underwent a significant transformation. In 2015, he articulated his outrage at Trump's rhetoric, likening him to a demagogue exploiting vulnerable populations. By 2021, however, Vance had pivoted dramatically, aligning himself with Trump's baseless claims of election fraud and expressing regret for his previous criticisms of the former president. "I ask folks not to judge me based on what I said in 2016," he stated, indicating a clear shift in his political allegiance.

The Response from Vance's Camp

In response to the leaked emails, Luke Schroeder, a spokesperson for Vance, characterized the release of these private conversations as "unfortunate." He emphasized that Vance values his friendships across the political spectrum and acknowledged that his views have evolved, particularly after becoming a father. Despite their differences, Schroeder noted that Vance still cares for Nelson and wishes her well.

Conclusion

The emails obtained by The New York Times serve as a compelling reminder of the fluidity of political beliefs and the complexities of personal relationships in the realm of politics. As Vance continues to navigate his role within the GOP, the contrast between his past and present views raises questions about authenticity and the motivations behind political transformations. The resurfacing of these comments, particularly in the context of his candidacy and Trump's endorsement, highlights the ongoing scrutiny faced by politicians as they reconcile their past with their present.

Home